Title | Material, energy and environmental performance of technological and social systems under a Life Cycle Assessment perspective |
---|---|
Publication Type | Articolo su Rivista peer-reviewed |
Year of Publication | 2011 |
Authors | Ulgiati, S., Ascione M., Bargigli S., Cherubini F., Franzese P.P., Raugei M., Viglia Silvio, and Zucaro Amalia |
Journal | Ecological Modelling |
Volume | 222 |
Pagination | 176-189 |
Keywords | Alternative fuels, Assessment procedure, Benchmarking, biofuels, Consistent performance, Conversion efficiency, Conversion systems, Emergy, Environmental aspects, environmental auditing, Environmental impact, environmental management, Environmental performance, Input datas, Integrated evaluation, life cycle, life cycle analysis, life cycle assessment, Life-cycle assessments, Local scale, Management strategies, Material resources, Multi methods, Multiple perspectives, Multiscales, Optimization, resource use, Social systems, Space and time, Time evolutions, Time-scale effects, timescale, urban system, Urban systems, waste management |
Abstract | Selected energy and material resource conversion systems are compared in this paper under an extended LCA point of view. A multi-method multi-scale assessment procedure is applied in order to generate consistent performance indicators based on the same set of input data, to ascertain the existence of constraints or crucial steps characterized by low conversion efficiency and to provide the basis for improvement patterns. Optimizing the performance of a given process requires that many different aspects are taken into account. Some of them, mostly of technical nature, relate to the local scale at which the process occurs. Other technological, economic and environmental aspects are likely to affect the dynamics of the larger space and time scales in which the process is embedded. These spatial and time scale effects require that a careful evaluation of the relation between the process and its surroundings is performed, so that hidden consequences and possible sources of inefficiency and impact are clearly identified. In this paper we analyse and compare selected electricity conversion systems, alternative fuels and biofuels, waste management strategies and finally the time evolution of an urban system, in order to show the importance of a multiple perspective point of view for the proper evaluation of a system's environmental and resource use performance. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. |
Notes | cited By 44 |
URL | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78049482136&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecolmodel.2010.09.005&partnerID=40&md5=3d807c2aa63dc854d2dc3ad38fcc0992 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.005 |
Citation Key | Ulgiati2011176 |