Title | Circular economy and environmental health in low- And middle-income countries |
---|---|
Publication Type | Articolo su Rivista peer-reviewed |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Authors | Wright, C.Y., Godfrey L., Armiento Giovanna, Haywood L.K., Inglesi-Lotz R., Lyne K., and Schwerdtle P.N. |
Journal | Globalization and Health |
Volume | 15 |
Pagination | 1–5 |
ISSN | 17448603 |
Keywords | conceptual framework, Developing countries, developing country, developing world, e-waste, economic development, economic status, Economics, Environmental conditions, environmental economics, environmental exposure, environmental factor, environmental health, environmental risk, Environmental sustainability, health care policy, health hazard, health impact, Health impact assessment, human, Humans, low income country, middle income country, policy implementation, poverty, priority journal, review, solid waste management, Sustainable development, unemployment, work environment |
Abstract | Background: The circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of 'take, make, and dispose'. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of 'design out waste and pollution', 'retain products and materials in use', and 'regenerate natural systems'. This commentary considers the risks and opportunities of the CE for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), acknowledging that LMICs must identify their own opportunities, while recognising the potential positive and negative environmental health impacts. Main body: The implementation of the CE in LMICs is mostly undertaken informally, driven by poverty and unemployment. Activities being employed towards extracting value from waste in LMICs are imposing environmental health risks including exposure to hazardous and toxic working environments, emissions and materials, and infectious diseases. The CE has the potential to aid towards the achievement of the SDGs, in particular SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). However, since SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) is critical in the pursuit of all SDGs, the negative implications of the CE should be well understood and addressed. We call on policy makers, industry, the health sector, and health-determining sectors to address these issues by defining mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations from the negative health impacts that may arise in LMICs as these countries domesticate the CE. Conclusion: Striving towards a better understanding of risks should not undermine support for the CE, which requires the full agency of the public and policy communities to realise the potential to accelerate LMICs towards sustainable production and consumption, with positive synergies for several SDGs. © 2019 The Author(s). |
Notes | cited By 0 |
URL | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076866363&doi=10.1186%2fs12992-019-0501-y&partnerID=40&md5=deb00aeb6b164fe2a39133b9ef9733ab |
DOI | 10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y |
Citation Key | Wright2019 |